ATTENTION: The existence of a recruiter or company on Contratados.org does not guarantee that it is trustworthy. Read more here.

Recruiter: Yanice Meaurio

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
Public record information
[ ? ]

What is Public Record Information?

Information from the public record refers to any data, documents, or other information that is maintained by a government body and accessible to the public. This website also includes non-government information that is available to the public, such as news articles, content from the Internet, and publicly-accessible research. This website reports on information found in the public record and cannot attest to the veracity of the information.
Visas: 
H-2B
Comments: 

Otra ubicación: Asunción, Paraguay. 

User-submitted information
[ Edit ]

This box contains information contributed by Contratados.org users and we cannot guarantee its accuracy. You can contribute information by clicking on “edit” above.

Visa offered: 
H-2B

Summary of reviews

Recruitment conditions

They charged me for the job offer:
Yes (0) No (0)

They charged me money but didn’t get me the job:
Yes (0) No (0)

They gave me a loan:
Yes (0) No (0)

Did they charge interest?
With high interest (0)
With low interest (0)
Without interest (0)

They gave me a work contract:
Yes (0) No (0)

The work was what I was promised:
Yes (0) No (0)

Recruitment practices

They treated me the same as everyone else:
Yes (0) No (0)

I think it was because of my:
race (1)
nationality (1)
language (1)
sex (1)
age (1)
sexual orientation (1)
other (1)

They punished me for making a complaint or for defending my rights:
Yes (0) No (0)

The punishment was:
They didn't hire me again (0)
Now they don't hire my relatives (0)
They retained my personal documents (0)
They threatened me (0)
Other (0)

They retained my personal documents:
Yes (0) No (0)

They threatened me:
Yes (0) No (0)

They physically assaulted me:
Yes (0) No (0)

They verbally assaulted me:
Yes (0) No (0)

They sexually assaulted me:
Yes (0) No (0)

They kept me somewhere against my will:
Yes (0) No (0)

Reviews

Trump's call for a protest crackdown has been a boon for Chinese propaganda Analysis by CNN's James Griffiths Protesters running amok. Innocent citizens under siege. Outside actors engaging in terrorist acts. Police struggling to maintain control and in desperate need of reinforcements. <a href=https://kra18-at.cc>kra12</a> That was how Chinese state media portrayed anti-government protests in Hong Kong last year, dismissing calls for greater democracy and an investigation into police brutality by focusing on individual acts of violence and property damage. <a href=https://kra18-at.cc>kra18.gl</a> Throughout the protests, the US was consistent in its support of people’s right to take to the streets and have their voice heard. Facing widespread unrest and public anger at home in the wake of the death of George Floyd, the reaction from US President Donald Trump appeared markedly different. <a href=https://kra18-at.cc>kra15.cc</a> On Monday, Trump called for the military to be deployed to “dominate” protesters, and demanded states do more to stem “acts of domestic terror.” <a href=https://kra18-at.cc>kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd</a> The irony has not been lost on Beijing, which on Thursday marks (or rather doesn’t, the date is highly censored) its own military crackdown on anti-government protesters on June 4, 1989. <a href=https://kra18-at.cc>как найти кракен</a> “Washington’s promise of equality and justice for all in the country has remained hollow at best,” state news agency Xinhua said in a commentary titled “The coming suffocation of the American dream.” “Amid the ongoing anti-racism protests in the country, decision-makers in Washington, instead of trying to sooth the pain and anger of the public, have been fanning the flames, calling protesters ‘THUGS,’ and threatening them with ‘the most vicious dogs, and most ominous weapons,” the commentary said. kra19.at https://kra18-at.cc China Daily, a state-backed newspaper, noted that “The US, after the killing of Floyd, seems to be on fire, and troops have been mobilized to subdue angry demonstrators.” “This is certainly not what the world expects to see in a country that is the world’s sole superpower,” it added. “But that sadly is the reality of the US.” This rhetoric isn’t just embarrassing for Washington, it’s also a sign of how the US may find its influence damaged by a perceived hypocrisy over human rights at home and abroad. Earlier today, Hong Kong’s leader Carrie Lam pointed to the unrest in the US as evidence of Washington’s “double standards.” “They attach great importance to the national security of their country, but look at our national security through tinted spectacles, especially the current situation in Hong Kong,” she added. The ability of Washington to influence Beijing’s position on Hong Kong – which is in part founded on fear of outside influence in the city – was already severely limited. The Trump administration’s reaction to protests at home may have hurt its position even further.
3